TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA

What each component means

A cipher suite names the algorithms a client and server agree on in one handshake. TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA combines DHE key exchange, DSS authentication, AES-256-CBC encryption and SHA1 integrity protection. Each part is explained below with its known weaknesses; for the bigger picture see how cipher suites work.

Key exchange: DHE, ephemeral finite-field Diffie-Hellman. A new DH key pair per handshake gives forward secrecy, but in TLS 1.2 the server alone picks the group and the client cannot ask for a stronger one; RFC 7919 (2016) added negotiated FFDHE groups, which saw little uptake. Logjam (CVE-2015-4000, 2015) broke servers that still accepted 512-bit export groups and showed that huge numbers of sites shared the same few 1024-bit primes, and the Raccoon timing attack (2020) exploits how TLS 1.2 strips leading zero bytes from the DH secret. Those are the reasons RFC 9325 (2022) gives for telling TLS 1.2 implementations not to negotiate TLS_DHE_* suites.

Authentication: DSS, meaning DSA certificates. Publicly trusted CAs only issue RSA and ECDSA certificates under the CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements, TLS 1.3 has no DSA signature scheme, and NIST's FIPS 186-5 (2023) no longer approves DSA for creating signatures, so DSS suites only survive in legacy private PKIs.

Encryption: AES with a 256-bit key, the 128-bit block cipher of FIPS 197 (2001). Most server and phone CPUs have AES instructions (AES-NI on x86, the ARMv8 cryptography extensions), which make it fast and avoid the cache-timing leaks of table-based software implementations.

Mode: CBC with MAC-then-encrypt. TLS 1.2 and earlier compute the HMAC over the plaintext, then pad and encrypt, so a receiver has to decrypt before it can check integrity. That ordering produced a long run of padding-oracle attacks: BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) against TLS 1.0's predictable IVs, Lucky Thirteen (CVE-2013-0169, 2013), which times the MAC check, and POODLE (CVE-2014-3566, 2014) against SSL 3.0's unchecked padding. RFC 9325 (2022) says CBC suites SHOULD NOT be used unless the encrypt_then_mac extension (RFC 7366) is also negotiated.

Integrity: HMAC-SHA1. SHA-1 collisions are practical (SHAttered, 2017), but HMAC does not rely on collision resistance, so HMAC-SHA1 record MACs are not considered broken; this suite's weak points lie elsewhere. When TLS 1.2 is negotiated, keys are derived with the SHA-256 PRF, which RFC 5246 (2008) applies to every cipher suite defined before it.

Why this rating

ssl.sh rating: Weak. The reasons:

• CBC mode with a separate MAC (MAC-then-encrypt), the construction behind padding-oracle attacks such as Lucky Thirteen; prefer an AEAD cipher.

How ssl.sh rates cipher suites

Which TLS libraries support it

Support for TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA as read from each library's own source code or official documentation on 2026-11-10. “Enabled by default” means the library negotiates it with no configuration; “off by default” means it is implemented but has to be switched on.

Enabled by default in 2 of the 9 libraries tracked here: NSS 3.133 and Java 21 (SunJSSE). Supported but off by default in: Windows Schannel (Windows 11 / Server 2022). Also implemented by: OpenSSL 3.5 and GnuTLS.

NSS shows the library's own defaults; Firefox switches every NSS suite off at start-up and re-enables only those with a security.ssl3.* or security.tls13.* preference. Java defaults are derived from the jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms value Oracle documents for JDK 21, which later updates may extend. The OpenSSL and GnuTLS rows only show whether the suite is implemented.

History and standards status

TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (0x00,0x38) is registered in the IANA TLS Cipher Suites registry with RFC 5246, “The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2” (August 2008, Standards Track) as its specification. RFC 5246 has since been obsoleted by RFC 8446 (2018) and RFC 9846 (2026). RFC 9325 (2022), part of BCP 195, says TLS 1.2 implementations SHOULD NOT negotiate TLS_DHE_* suites, citing the Raccoon attack and the poor uptake of negotiated groups. RFC 10015 (2026) now says clients MUST NOT offer and servers MUST NOT select FFDHE suites in (D)TLS 1.2, and IANA changed this entry's Recommended value to D.

Enable or disable it in Nginx and Apache

Disable

Either leave the suite out of your list or exclude it explicitly with a leading "!". Reload the server afterwards (nginx -s reload, apachectl graceful).

# Nginx
ssl_ciphers 'ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:!DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA';

# Apache httpd (mod_ssl)
SSLCipherSuite ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:!DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA

How to test whether a server accepts it

Offer only TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA with openssl s_client; if the handshake completes, the server accepts it:

openssl s_client -connect example.com:443 -tls1_2 -cipher DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA </dev/null

If the handshake succeeds, the server accepts the suite; "no cipher match" or a handshake failure means it doesn't.

nmap's ssl-enum-ciphers script connects repeatedly, trying one suite at a time, and lists every suite the server accepts with a grade from A to F. Look for TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA in its output:

nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 443 example.com

To decode a name or hex code, use the cipher suite lookup; the SSL checker shows which protocol versions a live server accepts and the cipher suite it negotiates.